GOVERNANCE ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FREE NUTRITIOUS MEAL PROGRAM

Ary Santoso; Briliantina Dwi Melianawati; Eka Avianti Ayuningtyas

doi:10.58290/jmbo.v4i1.423

Penulis

Ary Santoso Institut Pertanian Bogor
Briliantina Dwi Melianawati Institut Pertanian Bogor
Eka Avianti Ayuningtyas Institut Pertanian Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58290/jmbo.v4i1.423

Kata Kunci:

National Nutrition Agency, Free Nutritious Meal, Triangulation Model, AHP, SWOT

Abstrak

The Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) is one of the government’s strategic initiatives aimed at improving nutritional quality and public welfare, particularly for school-aged children. This article seeks to identify key governance factors of the MBG program that influence its implementation effectiveness and to provide policy recommendations to strengthen the governance of the National Nutrition Agency (BGN). This study employs a combination of approaches and methodologies, including the Triangulation Model, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis. The triangulation model identified eight (8) priority governance criteria for the MBG program: Participatory, Transparency, Accountability, Effectiveness-Efficiency, Collaboration, Digital Technology, Decentralization, and Program Evaluation. AHP results indicate that Effectiveness and Efficiency are the primary success factors of the MBG program, while Digital Technology serves as an enabler of Transparency and Evaluation, with improvements in Participation and Collaboration driven by a multi-stakeholder approach.

Referensi

Abelson, J., & Gauvin, F. P., 2006. Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence, and policy implications. Canadian Policy Research Networks, 6(3), 1-50.

Agustina, R., et al., 2021. School-based nutrition interventions in Indonesia: A systematic review. Journal of Nutrition, 15(3), 45-60.

Amsler, L. B., 2016. Collaborative governance: Integrating management, politics, and law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 700–711.

Ansell, C., & Gash, A., 2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Bank Dunia, 2020. Human Capital Index Report.

BAZNAS, 2024. Konsep pengelolaan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis dan penguatan mustahik Pusat Kajian Strategis BAZNAS.

Bevir, M., 2008. Key concepts in governance. SAGE Publications.

Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Hart, P. T., 2008. Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225-242.

Creswell, J. W., 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Dredge, D., & Jenkins, J., 2007. Tourism planning and policy. John Wiley & Sons.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J., 2006. Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press.

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S., 2012. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.

Farazmand, A., 2004. Globalization and Governance: A Theoretical Analysis. Sound Governance: Policy and Administrative Innovations. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Farazmand, A., 2004. Innovation in strategic public management: Building collaborative capacity. Public Organization Review, 4(1), 3-24.

Fung, A., 2015. Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.

Global Nutrition Report. (2021). The State of Global Nutrition.

Hai, K. A., Watulingas, R. R., & Singal, R., 2021. Pelaksanaan tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) di era pandemi COVID-19 menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015. Lex Administratum, 9(7), 35-42.

Ho, W., & Ma, X., 2018. The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399-414.

Holidin, D., & Handini, R., 2014. Collaborative governance dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, 18(1), 1-15.

Holidin, Defny & Handini, Rilyan, 2014. Sound Governance Analysis in the Innovation of Traditional Market Revitalization and Street Vendors Management. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal. 21. 10.20476/jbb.v21i1.4040.

Ikeanyibe, O. M., Ori, O. E., & Okoye, A. E., 2017. Governance paradigms in public administration and the dilemma of national development in Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(14), 1203–1216.

Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2023. Survei Status Gizi Indonesia (SSGI) 2023.

Khomsan, A., 2024. Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Menuju SDM Berkualitas. IPB Repository: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/158584

M.K. Kusrini, 2007. Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Penerbit Andi.

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Novatiani, A., Kusumah, R. W. R., & Vabiani, D. P., 2019. Pengaruh transparansi dan akuntabilitas terhadap kinerja instansi pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis, 10(1), 51-61

Obama, B. (2009). Transparency and Open Government. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies.

Patton, M. Q., 1999. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34 (5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.

Pratiwi, A., Sipangkar, S. W. R., Ramadhani, A. N. R., Mulyady, S., Hylmi, M. R., & Rahmawati, R., 2024. Analisis implementasi program makan bergizi gratis dalam kerangka teori mandat Hanna F. Pitkin. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial, 15(2), 120-135

Putra, B. R., & Diana, A, 2022. Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Pada Rumah Makan Ciganea Pusat. RADIAL: Jurnal Peradaban Sains, Rekayasa Dan Teknologi, 9(2), 250– 264. https://doi.org/10.37971/radial.v9i2.242

Rondinelli, D. A., 1981. Government Decentralization in Comparative Perspective: Theory and Practice in Developing Countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences.

Saaty, T. L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J., 2008. Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14(3), 271-327.

Sternin, M., & Choo, R. (2000). The Positive Deviance Approach to Improve Health Outcomes: Experience from Vietnam. The Positive Deviance Initiative.

http://www.positivedeviance.org/pdf/vietnam/vietnam_nutrition.pdf

Subramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R., 2012. A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 21.

Taras, H., 2005. Nutrition and Student Performance at School. Journal of School Health, 75(6), 199–213.

UNESCO, UNICEF, WHO, & World Bank. (2000). Focusing Resources on Effective School Health: A FRESH Start to Enhancing the Quality and Equity of Education. Dakar: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000124123

World Bank, 2022. Global Nutrition Report: Supply-Demand Dynamics in Food Assistance Programs.