EVALUASI KINERJA MODEL YOLOv11 UNTUK KLASIFIKASI TINGKAT KEMANISAN BUAH NANAS

Penulis

  • Willy Muhammad Fauzi Politeknik Negeri Subang
  • Dwi Vernanda Politeknik Negeri Subang
  • Tri Herdiawan Apandi Politeknik Negeri Subang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64626/jukomtek.v5i2.734

Kata Kunci:

Pineapple, YOLOv11, Object detection, Sweetness classification, Class imbalance

Abstrak

Sweetness is a primary determinant of pineapple quality, yet its conventional measurement requires cutting the fruit open and is therefore unsuitable for large-scale, non-destructive sorting. Existing image-based studies on pineapple sweetness generally treat the task as whole-image classification on pre-isolated fruit and report aggregate accuracy, leaving unclear how a model that must localize and classify simultaneously behaves at category boundaries. This study aims to measure and diagnose the performance limits of a single-view YOLOv11 detector in classifying pineapples into three sweetness categories, namely Asam (sour), Manis Ideal (ideal) and Sangat Manis (very sweet). A dataset of 4,475 annotated instances was trained for 50 epochs and evaluated using precision, recall, mean average precision, a confusion matrix, and confidence-threshold sensitivity curves. The model reached an overall mean average precision of 0.555 at an intersection-over-union threshold of 0.5, with a peak F1-score of 0.58; per class, Asam was the most reliable (0.695) while Manis Ideal (0.505) and Sangat Manis (0.465) lagged behind. At the default threshold only 32 to 64 percent of instances per class were classified correctly, far below the recall range observed on the training curves. The novelty of this work lies in the diagnostic characterisation of that gap: errors concentrate almost symmetrically between visually adjacent categories, not between the extremes, and reported recall substantially overstates behaviour at a real operating threshold. A single viewpoint without class-imbalance handling therefore cannot reliably separate boundary categories, which gives the empirical basis for the multi-view refinement pursued next.

Referensi

Azizi, H., Askari Asli-Ardeh, E., Jahanbakhshi, A., & Momeny, M. (2024). Vision-based strawberry classification using generalized and robust deep networks. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15, 100931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100931

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Kabupaten Subang. (2024). Kabupaten Subang Dalam Angka 2024 (Subang Regency in Figures 2024).

Bhargava, A., & Bansal, A. (2021). Fruits and vegetables quality evaluation using computer vision: A review. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 33(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.06.002

G, S., K, K., Rehsi, A., Misra, A., & Mishra, M. (2024). Fruit Quality Detection:A Comparative Study of the YOLO Series. 2024 International Conference on Innovative Computing, Intelligent Communication and Smart Electrical Systems (ICSES), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSES63760.2024.10910838

Goyal, K., Kumar, P., & Verma, K. (2023). AI-based fruit identification and quality detection system. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(16), 24573–24604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-14188-x

Johnson, J. M., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019). Survey on deep learning with class imbalance. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0192-5

Kanjanawattana, S., Teerawatthanaprapha, W., Praneetpholkrang, P., Bhakdisongkhram, G., & Weeragulpiriya, S. (2023). Pineapple Sweetness Classification Using Deep Learning Based on Pineapple Images. Journal of Image and Graphics, 11(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.18178/joig.11.1.47-52

Kumara, B. A. M. S., & Hettige, K. D. T. (2020). Ripening Stage Affects the Quality of Fresh and Dehydrated Pineapples (<i>Ananas comosus </i>(L.) Merr.)<i> cv. </i>Mauritius in Sri Lanka. Sustainable Food Production, 8, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/SFP.8.29

Maimunah Mohd Ali, Norhashila Hashim, Samsuzana Abd Aziz, & O.O. Lasekan. (2020). An overview of non-destructive approaches for quality determination in pineapples. Journal of Agricultural and Food Engineering, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37865/jafe.2020.0011

Miftahushudur, T., Sahin, H. M., Grieve, B., & Yin, H. (2025). A Survey of Methods for Addressing Imbalance Data Problems in Agriculture Applications. Remote Sensing, 17(3), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030454

Mohd Ali, M., Hashim, N., Bejo, S. K., Jahari, M., & Shahabudin, N. A. (2023). Innovative non-destructive technologies for quality monitoring of pineapples: Recent advances and applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 133, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.02.005

Nugraha Purnawan, N., Vernanda, D., Herdiawan Apandi, T., & Niqotaini, Z. (n.d.). Non-Destructive Classification Model of Pineapple Sweetness Level. 19(1).

Paull, R. E., Uruu, G., & Chen, N. J. (2020). Rapid Field Assay for Pineapple Fruit Acidity. HortTechnology, 30(5), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04664-20

Qiu, G., Lu, H., Wang, X., Wang, C., Xu, S., Liang, X., & Fan, C. (2023a). Nondestructive Detecting Maturity of Pineapples Based on Visible and Near-Infrared Transmittance Spectroscopy Coupled with Machine Learning Methodologies. Horticulturae, 9(8), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080889

Qiu, G., Lu, H., Wang, X., Wang, C., Xu, S., Liang, X., & Fan, C. (2023b). Nondestructive Detecting Maturity of Pineapples Based on Visible and Near-Infrared Transmittance Spectroscopy Coupled with Machine Learning Methodologies. Horticulturae, 9(8), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9080889

R., S. R., M. E., A., & M., M. (2021). Influence of post‐harvest physiology on sensory perception, physical properties, and chemical compositions of Moris pineapples ( Ananas comosus L.). Journal of Food Science, 86(9), 4159–4171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15877

Sangsongfa, A., Am-Dee, N., & Meesad, P. (2020). Prediction of Pineapple Sweetness from Images Using Convolutional Neural Network. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Context-Aware Systems and Applications, 7(21), 165518. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.165518

Siricharoen, P., Yomsatieankul, W., & Bunsri, T. (2023). Recognizing the sweet and sour taste of pineapple fruits using residual networks and green-relative color transformation attached with Mask R-CNN. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 196, 112174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112174

Vernanda, D., Apandi, T. H., Suhailla Binti Jili, A., Triastuti, D., & Muhammad Fauzi, W. (2026). Attention-Based Multi-View Fusion YOLO for Non-Destructive Pineapple Sweetness Assessment. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 10(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i2.7382

VIANA, E. D. S., SASAKI, F. F. C., REIS, R. C., JUNGHANS, D. T., GUEDES, I. S. A., & SOUZA, E. G. (2020). QUALITY OF FUSARIOSIS-RESISTANT PINEAPPLE FRF 632, HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT MATURITY STAGES. Revista Caatinga, 33(2), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252020v33n226rc

Wan Nurazwin Syazwani, R., Muhammad Asraf, H., Megat Syahirul Amin, M. A., & Nur Dalila, K. A. (2022). Automated image identification, detection and fruit counting of top-view pineapple crown using machine learning. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(2), 1265–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.053

Diterbitkan

30-07-2026

Cara Mengutip

Muhammad Fauzi, W., Vernanda, D., & Herdiawan Apandi, T. (2026). EVALUASI KINERJA MODEL YOLOv11 UNTUK KLASIFIKASI TINGKAT KEMANISAN BUAH NANAS. Jurnal Komputer Dan Teknologi, 5(2), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.64626/jukomtek.v5i2.734

Terbitan

Bagian

Kebijakan Bagian